Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cervantes v. Brown

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

June 28, 2017

RAMIRO CERVANTES, #R44942, Plaintiff,
v.
CHRISTINE BROWN and DR. VIPIN SHAH, Defendants.

          Nancy J. Rosenstengel Judge.

          PROTECTIVE ORDER

          DONALD G. WILKERSON United States Magistrate Judge.

         Defendant Vipin Shah, M.D., as an employee of Wexford Health Sources, Inc., (“Wexford”), seeks entry of a Protective Order relative to certain Wexford policies, procedures, and other internal records. A Protective Order is necessary and appropriate pursuant to the terms of Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to protect the proprietary nature of the documents sought and to maintain individual Defendants' security. The Court, being fully advised in the premises, hereby orders:

1. Portions of Wexford's policies, procedures, and other documents contain highly sensitive and proprietary business information that could be very valuable to Wexford's competitors if publically released. Said copies produced in this action shall be stamped with the phrase “Confidential and Subject to Protective Order” (the “protected documents”), stamped with the case number, with confidential and proprietary information redacted, and shall be protected and given confidential treatment as described in this Order.
2. Plaintiff's counsel can obtain a copy of such documents but must comply with all other provisions herein. Plaintiff's counsel may discuss the content of the documents with Plaintiff, but may not provide Plaintiff with copies of the documents.
3. These protected documents shall be maintained in confidence by counsel and shall not be disclosed to any person except:
a. This Court and its officers;
b. Stenographic reporters;
c. Counsel for Defendants;
d. Employees of counsel; and
e. Experts retained in this litigation.
4. Except as otherwise provided by this Order or by further order of the Court, the protected documents shall be used for no purpose other than prosecuting or defending the above-captioned proceeding and shall be disclosed in the manner provided in and only to the persons identified in Paragraphs 2 and 3, and they shall not be used in any other civil case, criminal case, litigation, or matter.
5. Individuals or entities permitted access to protected documents pursuant to Paragraph 3 above are hereby ordered not to show, convey or reproduce any information or document so designated, or parts thereof, or copies thereof, or any matter contained therein, or any abstracts or summaries thereof, to any individual or to any entity who would not otherwise have access to said material under the provisions of this order, unless they secure the written ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.