United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
June 10, 2015
ANDREW LAMON, R16056, Plaintiff,
HAROLD SCHULER, et. al., Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 50) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier with regard to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 37). There were no objections file with regard to the R & R.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objections to the R&R. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report and Recommendation is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 50) and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 37).
IT IS SO ORDERED.