Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bramlett v. Stover

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

April 8, 2015

CHARLES E. BRAMLETT, Plaintiff,
v.
MARK S. CARICH and JESSICA STOVER, Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 38) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Charles E. Bramlett's motion for judicial intervention and protection (Doc. 37).

The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

The Court has received no objection to the Report. It has reviewed the Report for clear error and finds none. Accordingly, the Court:

• ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 38); and
• DENIES Bramlett's motion for judicial intervention and protection (Doc. 37).

The Court further RESERVES RULING on Bramlett's motion to voluntarily dismiss this case without prejudice (Doc. 42) until it receives a response from the defendants or until the response period expires. See Local Rule 7.1(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.