Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Santiago v. Krause

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

March 27, 2015

ELIJAH SANTIAGO, Plaintiff,
v.
DOUGLAS A. KRAUSE, BRAD COLEMAN and SEAN WOLTERS, Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier (Doc. 116) recommending that the Court deny the motions to dismiss plaintiff Elijah Santiago's state law battery claims filed by defendants Douglas A. Krause, Brad Coleman and Sean Wolters (Docs. 92 & 108).

The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

No party has objected to the Report. The Court has reviewed the Report for clear error and finds none. Accordingly, the Court:

• ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 116); and
• DENIES the defendants' motions to dismiss (Docs. 92 & 108).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.