Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Carter v. Casteel

United States District Court, Southern District of Illinois

March 23, 2015

WILLIAM DALE CARTER, Plaintiff,
v.
TERESA CASTEEL, et el., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. PHIL GILBERT, DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 71) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier with regard to Defendant Teresa Casteel’s RN Harris Motion (Doc. 66) for Summary Judgment. The Plaintiff did not file any objections to the R & R.

The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 71) and GRANTS Defendant Teresa Casteel’s Motion (Doc. 66) for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.