United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
October 20, 2014
CHRISTOPHER FLORES, Plaintiff,
RICHARD HARRINGTON, et al., Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 24) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier with regard to Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Injunction (included in the Complaint at Doc. 1). The Plaintiff did not file any objections to the R & R.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 24) and Plaintiff's Request for Injunctive relief is DENIED (included in the Complaint at Doc. 1).
The Court further ORDERS that the Defendants are directed to SHOW CAUSE on or before November 17, 2014, as to why the Plaintiff's personal property and legal effects cannot be returned to him.
IT IS SO ORDERED.