Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Jennifer W.

Court of Appeals of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division

September 19, 2014

In re JENNIFER W. and JOSHUA W., Minors
v.
Ann W., Respondent-Appellant) (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee,

Page 330

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County. Nos. 13 JA 00155, 13 JA 00156 . The Honorable Bernard J. Sarley, Judge Presiding.

SYLLABUS

On appeal from the trial court's dispositional order with respect to respondent mother's two teenaged minor children, the appellate court found tat the trial court's findings that respondent was not able to care for the children, that reasonable efforts had been made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the children from the home, and that it was in the children's best interests to be made wards of the court were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, especially when the children refused to visit with her and the emotional and psychiatric problems in the household arose from respondent's relationship with the children.

For Appellant: Abishi C. Cunningham, Jr., Public Defender of Cook County, Stephanie Foster, Assistant Public Defender, Chicago, Illinois.

For Appellees: Robert F. Harris, Kass Plain, Christopher Williams, Cook County Office of the Public Guardian, Chicago, Illinois; Anita M. Alvarez, State's Attorney, Michele Lavin, Nancy Kisicki, Assistant State's Attorneys, Chicago, Illinois.

JUSTICE GORDON delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Justices McBride and Reyes concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

GORDON, JUSTICE.

Page 331

[¶1] The instant appeal arises from the juvenile court's entry of a dispositional order finding respondent Ann W. (the children's mother) unable to care for her children, 15-year-old Jennifer W. and 13-year-old Joshua W. Respondent argues that the juvenile court's finding that she was unable to care for her children and its finding that " reasonable efforts had been made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the minor[s] from the home" were against the manifest weight of the evidence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

[¶2] BACKGROUND

[¶3] On February 14, 2013, the State filed a petition for adjudication of wardship, asking for Jennifer W. to be adjudicated a ward of the court; the State also filed a motion for temporary custody the same day. The adjudication petition claimed that Jennifer was neglected: (1) in that she was " not receiving the proper or necessary support, education as required by law, or medical or other remedial care recognized under State law as necessary for her well-being, ***, including adequate food, clothing or shelter" ; and (2) in that she was a minor under 18 years of age " whose environment [was] injurious to her welfare." The adjudication petition also claimed that Jennifer was abused in that her parent or an immediate family member " [c]reate[d] a substantial risk of physical injury to such minor by other than accidental means which would be likely to cause death, disfigurement, impairment of emotional health, or loss or impairment of any bodily function."

[¶4] The facts underlying all three claims are the same. The children were living with their father, Randall W., while he and respondent were in the process of obtaining a dissolution of their marriage. Previously, respondent and Randall, her then-husband,[1] had one report indicating " substantial risk of harm." On February 11, 2013, the " father informed police personnel that he left this minor and her sibling home alone. Father stated that he is no longer willing or able to care for this minor and her sibling." Respondent's contact with Jennifer and Joshua was limited by a Kane County court order in the divorce proceedings, and there were no relatives willing or able to take care of Jennifer and Joshua.

[¶5] On the same day, the State filed a petition for adjudication of wardship and motion for temporary custody for Joshua, containing identical allegations to those contained in Jennifer's petition.

[¶6] Also on February 14, 2013, the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) investigator assigned to the children's case filed an " Affidavit Documenting DCFS Efforts," which stated that this case came to the attention of DCFS on February 11, 2013, when Randall voluntarily contacted Hanover Park police at approximately 8 a.m., " stating he had left the kids alone to go to a court date in

Page 332

Kane County and the two children refused to get up or go to school." [2] The police responded and found Joshua and Jennifer, who were 12 and 13 at the time, respectively, alone at home. Joshua was taken to the Hanover Park police station because he claimed to be ill, while Jennifer was taken to school, where she attended special education classes. The affidavit stated that Joshua had been diagnosed with depression and was on psychotropic medication and that Jennifer had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder. The next day, on February 12, 2013, Jennifer was hospitalized " due to severe aggression and her disorder."

[¶7] The affidavit stated that respondent and Randall had a prior indicated report for " allegations #60, Substantial risk of Physical injury, Environment injurious to health and welfare by neglect" in a case from 2010 " which was opened for Short Term intact services." [3] The affidavit further stated that respondent had " lost custody of her children per Kane County" as a result of the dissolution of her marriage.

[¶8] The affidavit listed, as " [t]he specific reasons(s) I have identified that leads DCFS to place or consider placing the child," that " Father is unable and unwilling to care for his child(ren), Mother is also unable at this time to care for her child(ren) based on mental health issues and a court report. Father admitted to CPI that he is unable to manage the behaviors of both children who have special need[s]. All family members located [reported] that they cannot or will not care for the children as they also feel their needs are too extensive to manage."

[¶9] Based on the facts alleged in the State's petitions for adjudication of wardship, on February 14, 2013, the juvenile court found probable cause that the children were abused or neglected and that immediate and urgent necessity existed to support their removal from the home. The court granted temporary custody to the DCFS guardianship administrator, with the right to place the children and the authority to consent to both ordinary and routine medical care and major medical care on their behalf. The court also entered an order granting respondent supervised day visits, which " shall occur at the discretion of the minors." On August 7, 2013, another order on visitation was entered, granting respondent supervised day visits, which " shall occur at the discretion of [the] minors in consultation with the children's individual therapist[s]."

[¶10] I. Adjudication of Wardship

[¶11] On January 21, 2014, at the hearing for adjudication of wardship, the parties stipulated to the following facts: that respondent and Randall are the parents of Jennifer, born on March 1, 1999, and Joshua, born on October 23, 2000, and that during the course of their dissolution of marriage proceedings in Kane County, Randall was awarded sole custody of the children, and respondent had limited visitation rights.

[¶12] The parties also stipulated that if called to testify, Hanover Park police officer Kathy McClaughry would testify that on February 11, 2013, she responded to a call from Randall and visited his home; ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.