Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Williams v. Fenoglio

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

September 10, 2014

LEONARD WILLIAMS, Plaintiff,
v.
DR. JAMES FENOGLIO, PHILLIPPE, DR. PHIL MARTIN, STEPHINE REED, HALLINGWORTH, LT. ROBERT BOLDREY, LT. VAUGHN, LT. DALLAS, EUBANK, WILLIS, RHONDES, NURSE POTTS, DOWNEY, CUMMINS, WARDEN HODGE and JOHN DOE NURSE, Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 44) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Leonard Williams' motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 43).

The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court:

• ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 44); and

• DENIES without prejudice Williams' motions for a preliminary injunction(Doc. 43).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.