United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
September 10, 2014
DETRICK CULLUM, Plaintiff,
LIEUTENANT PROVENCE; LIEUTENANT BROWN; SERGEANT/LIEUTENANT BROWDER; SERGEANT BUTLER; SERGEANT BRIDEWELL; JEFFERSON COUNTY, ILLINOIS; SAVATORE GODINEZ; and SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 79) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Detrick Cullum's motion for a preliminary injunction and an order of protection (Doc. 78).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court:
ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 79); and
DENIES without prejudice Cullum's motions for a preliminary injunction and an order of protection (Doc. 78).
Additionally, the Court further ORDERS Cullum to SHOW CAUSE on or before October 3, 2014, why the Court should not dismiss this case for failure to timely pay the entire $6.68 initial partial filing fee assessed on November 16, 2012, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) (Doc. 4). Payment of the entire balance due or a showing of no assets or means to pay (including a statement of trust fund transactions/balances for the entire period this case has been pending) shall be an acceptable response to this order to show cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.