United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
April 10, 2014
SHAD HAMMOND, Plaintiff,
C/O JAMES, MAJOR BRADLEY, C/O LIND, DR. REEVES, DR. WALLACE, K. DEEN, GINA ALLEN, S.A. GODINEZ, COUNSELOR HARTMAN, C/O FURLOW, DR. SHAH, WARDEN GAETZ and DR. VAN, Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 62) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson recommending that the Court deny the motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies filed by defendant Bart Lind (Doc. 56).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:
ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 62); and
DENIES Lind's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 56).
IT IS SO ORDERED.