United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
STEPHEN C. WILLIAMS, Magistrate Judge.
This case is before the Court for the purposes of docket control. The Court now takes up the pending Motions and Stipulations for Dismissal of certain Defendants.
Stipulation of Dismissal by Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (Doc. 129)
Before the Court is a Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendant Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., (Doc. 129) with an accompanying request to withdraw their pending Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 68).
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permit a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss claims without a court order by filing a stipulation for dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A). Defendant Foster Wheeler Corp. has entered such a stipulation. (Doc. 129). The case against Foster Wheeler is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule 41(a)(1). All parties shall bear their own costs. Additionally, per the representation in the relevant Stipulation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 68) is WITHDRAWN.
Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Selected Defendants Without Prejudice (Doc. 139)
Plaintiffs have filed a Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Borg Warner Morse Tech Inc. (successor by merger to Borg-Warner Corp.), Cleaver-Brooks Inc., Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., Georgia Pacific LLC, Hercules Inc., IMO Indust. Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Co., John Crane Inc., Joy Tech. LLC, Pneumo Abex LLC (successor in interest to Abex Corp.), Riley Power Inc. (f/k/a Riley Stoker Corp.), Trane U.S. Inc. (f/k/a American Standard Inc.), Warren Pumps LLC, Young Group Ltd. (f/k/a Young Sales Corp.), Young Insulation Group of St. Louis Inc., and Zurn Indust. LLC. (Doc. 139).
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow a party to move for dismissal "on terms the court considers proper." Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) is within the sound discretion of the court. Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Kopper Co. Inc., 627 F.2d 54, 56 (7th Cir. 1980). The relevant inquiry is whether the dismissal would prejudice the non-moving parties. Wojtas v. Capital Guardian Trust Co., 477 F.3d 924, 927 (7th Cir. 2007).
As an initial matter, the Court notes that although the Motion at Doc. 139 addresses Defendants Imo Industries Inc., Riley Power Inc., Warren Pumps LLC, and Joy Technologies, those Defendants were all previously dismissed pursuant to stipulations filed by those Defendants. (Doc. 126, 141). Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. has likewise filed a stipulation, discussed above, and will be dismissed pursuant to that stipulation. As to Defendants Borg Warner Morse Tec Inc., Cleaver-Brooks Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC, Hercules Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Co. John Crane Inc., Pneumo Abex LLC, Trane U.S. Inc., Young Group Ltd., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc., and Zurn Industries LLC, they shall be DISMISSED without prejudice. Although Defendants typically have thirty days to respond to a pending Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff's counsel represented in the body of the Motion that these defendants have informed Plaintiff's counsel that they have no objection to the dismissal. This representation was repeated to the Court at a scheduling conference where defense counsel was present. No party has objected or alleged any prejudice, and the Court cannot find any prejudice that would be caused by the dismissal. Therefore, those Defendants will be dismissed. Zurn Indust. LLC's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 71) is MOOT. Young Group Ltd.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 75) is MOOT. Young Insulation Group of St. Louis Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 79) is MOOT.
Plaintiffs have also represented that the dismissal of certain cross-claims is warranted by these dismissals. Defendants Trane U.S. Inc. (Doc. 46), Ingersoll-Rand Co. (Doc. 47), BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. (Doc. 56), John Crane Inc. (Doc. 88), Warren Pumps LLC (Doc. 112), and Imo Indust. Inc. (Doc. 113) have all filed counterclaims seeking contribution and indemnity in the event they are found liable based on the allegations in Plaintiffs' Complaint. Plaintiffs have represented that the Defendants who will remain in the case after the dismissal do not object to the dismissal of the counterclaims. Because it appears to the Court that dismissal of these Defendants will ultimately preclude a finding of liability for which they could seek contribution or indemnity, the counterclaims are also DISMISSED without prejudice.
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice as to Selected Defendants (Doc. 140)
Plaintiffs have filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice as to Selected Defendants: Certain-Teed Corp. Crown Cork & Seal Co. Inc., Fisher Scientific LLC, Ford Motor Co., Honeywell Int'l Inc., Kelly Moore Paint Co. Inc., Sprinkmann Insulation Inc., Sprinkmann Sons Corp. of Illinois, and Union Carbide Co. (Doc. 140).
Plaintiffs are permitted to dismiss a party "without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party services either an answer or a motion for summary judgment." Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Here, none of the above Defendants have entered an appearance or filed any type of responsive pleading. Therefore, pursuant to ...