Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Nelson

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division

March 19, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
NOLAN RAMON NELSON, Defendant.

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.

Pending is the Motion of Defendant Nolan Ramon Nelson under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to Reduce Sentence pursuant to a retroactive amendment to the sentencing guidelines. Pending also is the Defendant's Supplemental Motion to Reduce Sentence.

I.

On March 18, 2003, the Defendant entered into a written plea agreement [d/e 26], wherein he agreed to plead guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment which charged conspiracy to distribute 50 or more grams of cocaine base ("crack") and at least five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). The remaining counts were dismissed. On August 22, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to 262 months imprisonment.

At sentencing, the Defendant's Offense Level was calculated to be 34 and his Criminal History Category was determined to be VI, which resulted in a Guideline Range of 262-327 months. Because of two previous felony drug offenses, the Defendant's statutory minimum at the time was life imprisonment which meant that his guideline range was life under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1.

Following a motion by the Government under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e), the Court imposed a sentence of 262 months.

The Defendant appealed his sentence, contending that the Court erred in its guideline calculation for the purposes of a starting base offense level prior to applying a reduction for substantial assistance. On June 21, 2007, the Seventh Circuit rejected the Defendant's argument and affirmed his sentence, ruling that:

We affirm the judgment of the district court because we do not accept Nelson's argument that the sentencing judge erred in calculating his advisory range in a manner that most closely reflects a plain reading of the Guidelines. In reaching this conclusion, we also note that the district court's methodology resulted in a lower sentence than Nelson would have received if the court had used his life expectancy to calculate his reduced sentence.

United States v. Nelson, 491 F.3d 344, 346 (7th Cir. 2007).

Subsequently, the Defendant requested the assistance of the Federal Public Defender's Office in filing a motion for reduction of sentence based on the retroactive crack cocaine amendment. On February 19, 2008, the Federal Public Defender's Office was appointed to represent the Defendant. On April 2, 2008, the Court granted counsel's motion to withdraw. The Defendant did not further pursue a motion at that time.

On October 21, 2008, the Defendant filed a Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct his Sentence. See Nolan Nelson v. United States, Case No. 08-3235. On April 17, 2009, this motion was dismissed based on the Defendant's waiver of collateral attack contained in the Plea Agreement.

On February 12, 2013, he filed the instant motion. The Assistant Federal Public Defender was appointed and later permitted to withdraw. Attorney J. Randall Cox was later appointed. In an Order entered on November 21, 2013, Mr. Cox was also allowed to withdraw.

In the November 21, 2013 Order, the Court noted that individuals seeking relief under § 3582 are not entitled to counsel at public expense. The Court directed the Government to Respond to the Defendant's Motion.

On December 16, 2013, the Government filed its Response. On February 19, 2014, the Defendant ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.