David R. Herndon, Chief Judge United States District Court.
On March 31, 2011, Dorvil filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1). Petitioner claims that he should be given credit for his time spent in custody from May 27, 2007 through July 9, 2008 as discussed at the time of sentencing by District Judge Daniel T. Hurley, District Court for the Southern District of Florida. On April 11, 2011, Judge Hurley ordered the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) to credit the petitioner with the time he requested in this petition. Thereafter the BOP recomputed petitioner’s sentence making him eligible for release on January 16, 2013. Petitioner was released from custody on February 12, 2013.
On November 22, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson submitted a Report and Recommendation (“the Report”) recommending that the Court deny petitioner’s petition as moot and dismiss the matter. The Report was sent on December 16, 2013 to the parties with a notice informing them of their right to file objections within fourteen days of service. Neither party filed timely objections to the Report. Thus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court need not conduct a de novo review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). In reviewing the unobjected to Report for clear error, the Court is satisfied that Magistrate Judge Wilkerson’s recommendation is correct. See Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the Court ...