Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Stanton

United States District Court, Seventh Circuit

November 14, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
CJP THOMAS LEE STANTON, Defendant.

PRELIMINARY ORDER FOR FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO FED.R.CRIM.P. 32.2 WITH RESPECT TO THOMAS LEE STANTON

DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief District Judge.

In the Indictment filed in the above cause on April 18, 2013, the United States sought forfeiture of pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) of property possessed by defendant, Thomas Lee Stanton. TheCcourt, upon consideration of guilty plea in this matter, hereby finds that the following property is forfeitable and hereby orders forfeited the following property:

Any firearms, including, but not limited to, any destructive device, involved in or used in said violation, included, but not limited to, Molotov cocktails, bomb making components and paraphernalia, and "cricket" bombs comprised of CO2 cartridges, fuses, and explosive powder.

The United States shall provide notice of the forfeiture and the right of persons other than the defendant who have any claim or legal interest in any of the property to file a petition with the Court. The notice shall be provided in a manner consistent with Supplemental Rule G(4)(a) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.

The notice shall state that the petition shall be set for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of the petitioner's alleged interest in the property, shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury, and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner's right, title, or interest in the forfeited property, the time and circumstances of the petitioner's acquisition of the right, title or interest in the property, any additional facts supporting the petitioner's claim, and the relief sought.

The United States shall, also to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person known to have alleged an interest in the property that is the subject of the Order for Forfeiture, as a substitute for the published notice to those persons so notified.

Upon the filing a petition alleging the third-party interests in the property, the court may amend this order to resolve the claimed third-party interests.

The United States Marshal or the custodian for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives shall seize and reduce to his possession, if he has not already done so, the above-described property.

This Order, pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4)(A) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, shall become final with respect to defendant Thomas Lee Stanton at the time of the defendant's sentencing, regardless of whether or not the rights of actual or potential third-party petitioners have been determined by that time. This Order shall be made part of the sentence of defendant Thomas Lee Stanton and shall be included in the Judgment imposed against the defendant. Although this Order will be a final order with respect to the defendant at the time of sentencing, this Order may later be amended with respect to petitions filed by third-parties claiming an interest in the subject-matter forfeited property. Digitally signed by


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.