September 20, 2013
ROBERT MOORE, Plaintiff,
PAT QUINN, S.A. GODINEZ, SARAH JOHNSON, LOUIS SHICKER, DEBBIE DENNING, JACLYN O’DAY, MARC HODGE, DR. PHIL MARTIN, CHARLES FASANO, LISA PRATHER, DENNIS LARSON, DR. J. FENOGLIO, ELAINE HARDY, PAMELA MORAN, BRANDON RISSE, and DOWNEN, Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 58) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court grant defendant Dr. Phil Martin’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 49) and dismiss Martin from this case.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the R & R. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 58) and GRANTS Martin’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 49). Count One remains against defendant Dr. J. Fenoglio.
IT IS SO ORDERED.