Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Stollings v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

August 13, 2013

BRANDON STOLLINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, No. 08 C 4006 Gary S. Feinerman, Judge.

Before DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge, JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge, DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

ORDER

The opinion issued on August 2, 2013 is hereby AMENDED as follows:

On page 19, the fifth sentence in the full paragraph before heading "B" is amended as follows: "The court then concluded that Graham's testimony had to be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence Civil Procedure 702 because the fact that the 90 percent effectiveness input was not reliable rendered Graham's entire opinion unreliable." As amended the sentence now reads: "The court then concluded that Graham's testimony had to be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 because the fact that the 90 percent effectiveness input was not reliable rendered Graham's entire opinion unreliable."

On page 27, the second sentence in the paragraph starting after heading "III" is amended by deleting the period at the end of the phrase "correctly states the law" and a comma is inserted in its place, just before the citation to Lewis v. City of Chicago Police Dep't.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.