MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
Plaintiff, currently incarcerated at USP-Marion ("Marion"), has brought this pro se action under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b); § 2671 et seq. He also asserts a civil rights claim for alleged violations of his constitutional rights by persons acting under the color of federal authority. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
Specifically, Plaintiff states that on July 11, 2012, he slipped and fell on a wet floor, which had not been marked with any warning signs after it was mopped (Doc. 1, p. 6). The area where Plaintiff fell was a ramp with a 20-25% grade, which contributed to his painful back injury.
Plaintiff sought emergency medical attention later on the day of his injury, and again requested help over the next few weeks. He was seen by Defendants Castillo and Bagwell (physician's assistants), and by Defendant Dr. Szoke, but states that none of these practitioners examined him. Further, although Plaintiff continued to request treatment at sick call (operated by Defendant Cullers, a nurse), and by speaking directly to Defendant Winclemeyer (medical administrator) none was given nor was he administered any medical tests. Consequently, he has endured severe pain over the past year following his injury due to the medical Defendants' deliberate indifference. Plaintiff's tort claim was denied on January 16, 2013 (Doc. 6, p. 6). Only recently have these Defendants recognized that he was in fact injured in the fall, and they have begun treatment and testing to address his needs (Doc. 6., pp. 2-5).
Merits Review Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A
Under § 1915A, the Court is required to conduct a prompt threshold review of the complaint, and to dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from an immune defendant.
Accepting Plaintiff's allegations as true, the Court finds that Plaintiff has articulated a colorable Federal Tort Claim against the United States (Count 1). In addition, the complaint states an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to medical needs for the delay in treating Plaintiff's injuries, against Defendants Szoke, Winclemeyer, Bagwell, Castillo, and Cullers (Count 2). Both claims shall receive further review.
Plaintiff's motion for recruitment of counsel (Doc. 3) shall be referred to United States Magistrate Judge Frazier for further consideration.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to complete, on Plaintiff's behalf, a summons and form USM-285 for service of process on Defendants SZOKE, WINCLEMEYER, BAGWELL, CASTILLO, and CULLERS; the Clerk shall issue the completed summons. The United States Marshal SHALL serve Defendants SZOKE, WINCLEMEYER, BAGWELL, CASTILLO, and CULLERS pursuant to Rule 4(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States, and the Clerk shall provide all necessary materials and copies to the United States Marshals Service.
In order to effect service on Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to complete, on Plaintiff's behalf, a summons for service of process on the United States; the Clerk shall issue the completed summons. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i), the Clerk shall (1) personally deliver to or send by registered or certified mail addressed to the civil-process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois a copy of the summons, the complaint, and this Memorandum and Order; and (2) send by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C., a copy of the summons, the complaint, and this Memorandum and Order.
Plaintiff shall serve upon Defendants (or upon defense counsel once an appearance is entered), a copy of every pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper to be filed a certificate stating the date on which a true and correct copy of the document was served on Defendants or counsel. Any paper received by a district judge or magistrate judge that has not been filed with the Clerk or that fails to include a certificate of service will be disregarded by the Court.
Defendants are ORDERED to timely file an appropriate responsive pleading to the complaint and shall not waive filing a reply ...