Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Yasmin & Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, Seventh Circuit

May 21, 2013

IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 2100) This Document Relates To: Kara Abbott
v.
Melissa Aiger
v.
Emily Blevins
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13011-DRH-PMF Shaina Collins
v.
Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13108-DRH-PMF Andrea Hollowell
v.
Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13229-DRH-PMF Melissa Johnson
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-11996-DRH-PMF Elizabeth Law
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13240-DRH-PMF Karan and Ruy Lozano
v.
Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13205-DRH-PMF Marissa Lytle
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-12586-DRH-PMF Marilou Mewborn
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13274-DRH-PMF Amy and Brian Monroe
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13238-DRH-PMF Sharon Morrison
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-12706-DRH-PMF Heather Norris
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13241-DRH-PMF Amanda and Robert Perkins
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13230-DRH-PMF Rhanda Smith
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-12090-DRH-PMF Laura Tenorio
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-20002-DRH-PMF Karen Wafa
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13203-DRH-PMF Tina Westmoreland
v.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13239-DRH-PMF Rukaiyah Williams

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

David R. Herndon, Chief Judge U.S. District Court

DECISION

These matters are before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order Dismissing with Prejudice entered on May 20, 2013, the above captioned cases are DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.