<--opinion text="" starts="" here//--="">
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
WILLIAM D. STIEHL, District Judge.
On March 25, 2013, the United States of America and defendant Paige R. Davis consented to appear before Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and SDIL Rule 72.1(b)(2). At that time, the defendant en-tered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment.
On April 1, 2013, Judge Wilkerson submitted a Report recommending that the un-dersigned District Judge accept the plea of guilty, that a presentence investigation and re-port be prepared, and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly (Doc. 47).
The Report included a notice to the parties informing them of their right to appeal by way of filing "Objections" within fourteen (14) days of service of the Report and Rec-ommendation. Neither party has filed an objection, therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court need not conduct de novo review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985); Video Views Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986).
Accordingly, the undersigned District Judge ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Wilker-son's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 47), ACCEPTS defendant Paige R. Davis' plea of guilty, and ADJUDGES defendant Paige R. Davis guilty of Count 1 of the Indictment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.