Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

City of Greenville, Il; Village of v. Syngenta Crop Protection

March 19, 2013

CITY OF GREENVILLE, IL; VILLAGE OF COULTERVILLE, IL; VILLAGE OF EVANS- VILLE, IL; VILLAGE OF FARINA, IL; CITY OF GILLESPIE, IL; CITY OF CAMERON, MO; CITY OF CONCORDIA, MO; CITY OF CARBONDALE, KS; CITY OF MARION, KS; MIAMI COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT NO. 2; CITY OF OSWEGO, KS; CITY OF JASPER, IN; VILLAGE OF MONROEVILLE, OH; CITY OF UPPER SANDUSKY, OH; CRESTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES; ILLINOIS-AMERICAN WATER CO.; MISSOURI-AMERICAN WATER CO.; INDIANA-AMERICAN WATER CO., INC.; IOWA-AMERICAN WATER CO.; OHIO-AMERICAN WATER CO.; CHARITON MUNICIPAL WATERWORKS; AND VILLAGE OF OTTAWA, OH, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC., AND SYNGENTA AG, DEFENDANTS. ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER AND PRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK, INTERVENORS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge

JUDGMENT REGARDING SEALED DOCUMENTS

This matter having come before the Court and the Court having rendered a decision,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the following documents may not be maintained under seal in this case:

Doc. 112 (main document);

Exhibits 1-5, 8-13, 17, 19, 23, 25, 28, 29, 31, 32, 36, 37, 40, 47, 49, 54, 57, 58-60, 68, 69, 71, 79, 95, 107, 116, 117, 119, 123, 134, 144, 146, 152, 157, 159, 165, 167, 169, 170, 175, 176, 181, 182, 185, 187, 193-197, 199, 207, 209, 217-219, 222-224, 226, 228, 229, 231, 232, 238, 241, 249, 255, 272-275, 278, 288-293, 298, 306, 318, 325, 329, 330, 332-334, 338, 345, 346, 348, 357-360 and 363-365 to Doc. 112; Doc. 114; Doc. 116; Doc. 121; Doc. 127; Doc. 128; and Doc. 134.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the following documents shall be maintained under seal in this case:

Exhibits 14-16, 18, 20-22, 24, 26, 27, 30, 33-35, 38, 39, 41-46, 48, 50-53, 55, 56, 61-67, 70, 72-78, 80-94, 96-101, 103-106, 108-115, 118, 120-122, 124-133, 135-137, 139-143, 145, 147-151, 153-156, 158, 160-164, 166, 168, 171-174, 177-180, 183, 184, 186, 188-191, 200, 201, 203-206, 208, 210-216, 220, 221, 227, 230, 233-237, 239-240, 242-248, 250-254, 256-271, 276, 277, 279-287, 297, 299-305, 307-317, 319-321, 323, 324, 326, 327, 331, 335-337, 340-344, 347, 349-356, 362 to Doc. 112;

Exhibits 338-348 to Doc. 115.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the following Exhibits to Doc. 112 may be not be maintained under seal but may be redacted as follows:

Exhibit 6: Hertl Dep. 77:6 and 77: 23 redacted;

Exhibit 7: Hawkins Dep. 7:21 redacted;

Exhibit 102: salary information redacted;

Exhibit 138: name and position/title of employee redacted from pp. 1 and 2;

Exhibit 192: name and position/title of employee redacted ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.