Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

James Gamble, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. At&T Mobility LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


February 12, 2013

JAMES GAMBLE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Murphy, District Judge:

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter came before the Court on Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC's motion to compel arbitration and stay this action (Doc. 16). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to Defendant's motion (Doc. 28). Each party later filed supplemental papers in support of their respective position (See Docs. 33, 37, and 41).

On February 11, 2013, the Court entertained oral argument on Defendant's motion to compel arbitration. The issue presented here falls squarely within the confines of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011) and its progeny. For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and stay this action (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. Defendant's motion for a protective order (Doc. 26) is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED.

G. PATRICK MURPHY United States District Judge

20130212

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.