Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Litigation

United States District Court, Seventh Circuit

January 25, 2013

IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, MDL, 2100

ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL

HERNDON, Chief Judge

This Document Relates to:

Lakisha Tutton, et al. v. Bayer Pharma AG, et al. No. 3:12-cv-10133-DRH-PMF[1]

Tamika Johnson, et al. v. Bayer Pharma AG, et al. No. 3:12-cv-10141-DRH-PMF[2]

Susan Lamb, et al. v. Bayer Pharma AG, et al. No. 3:12-cv-10164-DRH-PMF[3]

Lee Ann Michaud, et al. v. Bayer Pharma AG, et al. No. 3:12-cv-10165-DRH-PMF[4]

The specified plaintiffs, in the above captioned actions, have filed motions to vacate the Court’s order of dismissal without prejudice for failure to comply with Plaintiff Fact Sheet Requirements. Each plaintiff states that she is now in compliance with her PFS obligations. As to each of the above referenced plaintiffs, Bayer has filed a notice of non-opposition.

Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the orders dismissing without prejudice each of the above referenced plaintiffs claims and thereby REINSTATES the same.

SO ORDERED:


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.