David R. Herndon, Chief Judge United States District Court
Now before the Court is defendant’s motion to continue (Doc. 18). Defendant states that he needs additional time for pretrial matters. The government does not object. The Court being fully advised in the premises finds that defendant needs additional time for pretrial matters. The Court finds that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The Court also finds that to deny a continuance of the matter would result in a miscarriage of justice.
Therefore, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion to continue (Doc. 18). The Court CONTINUES the jury trial scheduled for January 14, 2103 to February 11, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. The time from the original motion was filed, January 10, 2013, until the date to which the trial is rescheduled, February 11, 2013, is excludable time for the purposes of speedy trial.
Should either party believe that a witness will be required to travel on the Justice Prisoner and Alien Transportation System (JPATS) in order to testify at the trial of this case, a writ ...