Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Albert Thomas and Atg, A Minor v. Zion Lutheran School

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


December 14, 2012

ALBERT THOMAS AND ATG, A MINOR, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ZION LUTHERAN SCHOOL, DAVID KNIEPKAMP, ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH, GARY BYERS, RICK GOVE, TERRY MARINO, CATHY RUDOLT AND HELEN MYERS, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on review of plaintiff Albert Thomas's complaint (Doc. 1). The unredacted complaint (Doc. 2) is 150 pages long (more than half of which are single-spaced) and consists of 498 paragraphs. It also has 47 pages of exhibits attached. It contains excessive detail, substantial legal argument and extensive citation to evidence. Thomas's pleading does not comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a):

(a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain:

(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support;

(2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and

(3) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.

Because it does not comply with Rule 8(a), the Court STRIKES the complaint, but ORDERS that Thomas shall have up to and including January 7, 2013, to file an amended complaint that complies with Rule 8(a). The amended complaint should include a statement about why a federal court has jurisdiction over this case, a short, plain statement about how Thomas believes the defendantsharmed him, and a short, plain statement of what he wants the Court to do. He may include a brief statement of the background facts he thinks are important to give context to his allegations against the defendants, but he does not need to allege every factual detail, include evidentiary material or cite extensive legal argument at this point. Based on a cursory review of the complaint, the Court believes Thomas can accomplish this in twenty pages or less. Accordingly, it will limit his amended complaint to twenty pages. The amended complaint must also comply with Local Rule 5.1(b), which states:

(b) General Format of Papers Presented for Filing

All pleadings, motions, documents, and other papers presented for filing shall be on 81/2 " x 11" white paper of good quality, flat and unfolded, and shall be plainly typewritten, printed, or prepared by a clearly legible duplication process and double-spaced, except for quoted material. Each page shall be numbered consecutively. This rule does not apply to

(a) exhibits submitted for filing and (b) documents filed in removed actions prior to removal from state court. (emphasis added). If Thomas fails to timely file an amended complaint that complies with Rule 8(a), the Court may dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The Court further DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send Thomas a copy of the Court's Pro Se Litigant Guide along with this order. The Court RESERVES RULING on the motions pending in this case until it reviews the amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. Phil Gilbert

20121214

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.