Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Tina L. Tripplett and Louis A. Tripplett

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


September 28, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TINA L. TRIPPLETT AND LOUIS A. TRIPPLETT, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on defendant Louis Tripplett's Motion to Sever (Doc. 33). The Government filed its response (Doc. 34) informing the Court it has no objection to the motion to sever.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(b), defendants may be joined in the same indictment if they have "participated in the same act or transaction, or in the same series of acts or transactions, constituting an offense or offenses." However, under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 14(a), if joinder of defendants "appears to prejudice a defendant or the government, the court may order separate trials of counts, sever the defendants' trials, or provide any other relief that justice requires." Together, Rules 8 and 14 "are designed to promote economy and efficiency and to avoid a multiplicity of trials, where these objectives can be achieved without substantial prejudice to the right of the defendant to a fair trial." United States v. Madison, 689 F.2d 1300, 1305 (7th Cir. 1982).

Louis Tripplett points out that he has been in custody for four months while his co- defendant, Tina Tripplett, remains a fugitive. As the Government indicated in its response, there is still no estimate at what time Tina Tripplett will be apprehended. Louis Tripplett would be prejudiced if he were to remain detained and have to wait to go to trial indefinitely, until his co-defendant is apprehended. Further, discovery from the Government has revealed to defendant that his conduct is easily distinguishable from Tina Tripplett's charged conduct.

For the above-mentioned reason, the Court finds that failure to sever the defendants in this case would result in substantial prejudice to defendant Louis Tripplett. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Louis Tripplett's motion to sever (Doc. 33).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. Phil Gilbert

20120928

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.