UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
August 20, 2012
IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE)) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge:
This Document Relates to:
Bayer Schering Pharma, AG, et al.
Laurie Armetta v. Bayer Corp., et al.
No. 3:10-cv-13502-DRH-PMF No. 3:10-cv-12882-DRH-PMF
On March 1, 2012 (Rosenthal) and May 31, 2012 (Armetta) the Court granted the Bayer defendants' motions to dismiss, without prejudice, the claims of the above captioned plaintiffs for failure to comply with the Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS) requirements. Each plaintiff has filed a motion to reinstate the case stating compliance with the PFS requirements. Bayer has responded stating that it is not opposed to reinstatement in either case.
Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the order dismissing the above referenced cases without prejudice. Further, the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to REINSTATE the same.
SO ORDERED: Digitally signed by
David R. Herndon
Date: 2012.08.20 15:58:36 -05'00'
United States District Court
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.