Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone)) Marketing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


August 20, 2012

IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE)) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge:

ORDER

VACATING DISMISSAL

This Document Relates to:

LeAnne Rosenthal

v.

Bayer Schering Pharma, AG, et al.

Laurie Armetta v. Bayer Corp., et al.

No. 3:10-cv-13502-DRH-PMF No. 3:10-cv-12882-DRH-PMF

ORDER

On March 1, 2012 (Rosenthal) and May 31, 2012 (Armetta) the Court granted the Bayer defendants' motions to dismiss, without prejudice, the claims of the above captioned plaintiffs for failure to comply with the Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS) requirements. Each plaintiff has filed a motion to reinstate the case stating compliance with the PFS requirements. Bayer has responded stating that it is not opposed to reinstatement in either case.

Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the order dismissing the above referenced cases without prejudice. Further, the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to REINSTATE the same.

SO ORDERED: Digitally signed by

David R. Herndon

Date: 2012.08.20 15:58:36 -05'00'

Chief Judge

United States District Court

20120820

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.