Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sec v. the Nutmeg Group

August 13, 2012

SEC
v.
THE NUTMEG GROUP, LLC, ET AL.



Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge Sharon J. Coleman Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge

CASE TITLE

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

Before the Court is a motion filed by Michael Alonso et al. ("the Alonso Petitioners") seeking a declaration that they are entitled to file a derivative claim against the Receiver and her retained counsel as of right, or alternatively, seeking permission to file their claim [doc. 406]. For the reason stated herein, the motion is granted.

O[ For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.

STATEMENT

Background

The SEC filed the complaint on March 23, 2009. This case involves the ongoing misappropriation of client assets, misrepresentations to investors, and failure to maintain required books and records by The Nutmeg Group, LLC ("Nutmeg"), by Randall Goulding, Nutmeg's owner and managing member, and by David Goulding, Nutmeg's Chief Compliance Officer.

Nutmeg acts as an investment adviser to 15 unregistered investment vehicles ("the Funds"), and has invested fund assets almost exclusively in private investments in public equity ("PIPE") transactions. As the general partner and/or investment adviser for each of the Funds, Nutmeg claims to have assets under management of at least $32 million.

On August 6, 2009, the Court appointed Leslie Weiss as the Receiver for Nutmeg. The Appointment Order granted Weiss the power to oversee all aspects of Nutmeg's business and to take custody of all of Nutmeg's funds, including the power to sell or liquidate assets or spend money to further Nutmeg's business.

The order also required Nutmeg's officers to assist Weiss in fulfilling her duties and obligations as Receiver. The order specifically shielded the Receiver and her retained personnel from liability for their compliance with their duty. It provided that "[i]n no event shall the Receiver or Retained Personnel be liable to anyone

(1) with respect to the performance of their duties and responsibilities as Receiver and Retained Personnel, or

(2) for any actions taken or omitted by them, except upon a finding by this Court that they acted or failed to act as a result of malfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or in reckless disregard of their duties."

On July 7, 2011, Randall Goulding sought leave to file suit against the Receiver for allegedly publishing false statements about him. Before the parties completed briefing on the motion, Goulding filed, without leave from this Court, his complaint against the Receiver and retained personnel in the Circuit Court of Cook County. The Receiver removed that complaint to the Northern District of Illinois (assigned case No. 11 cv 5354 and reassigned for relatedness to this Court's calendar). In ruling on the motion for leave to file the suit, this Court found that the Barton Doctrine required Goulding to seek leave from this Court in order to file suit in the Circuit Court of Cook County and the Court then denied leave based on the immunity provided in the Appointment Order. The Court dismissed Goulding's complaint for lack of jurisdiction, his motion for reconsideration was denied, and Goulding filed his appeal.

Now, the Alonso petitioners, who are limited partners in investment pools ("the funds") which, until 2009, were managed by The Nutmeg Group, LLC, seek to file a complaint against Weiss as Receiver and her counsel Barnes & Thornburg personally for violation of ยง206(a)(4) of the Investment ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.