Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Malone Drakkar v. John Doe

July 19, 2012

MALONE DRAKKAR, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Murphy, District Judge:

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

On February 24, 2012, Plaintiff filed a complaint with this Court alleging § 1983 violations against numerous defendants (Doc. 1). The complaint failed to identify by name any defendants who bore personal responsibility for the alleged conduct, and thus the matter could not proceed further. As a result, Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty-five days of May 30, 2012, the date of this Court's Order (Doc. 14). Plaintiff was clearly warned in that Order that failure to do so could lead to dismissal of this case. Thirty-five days have since passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. As a result, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to comply with an order of this Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk's office is directed to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

G. PATRICK MURPHY United States District Judge

20120719

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.