The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sue E. Myerscough, U.S. District Judge:
Thursday, 19 July, 2012 05:21:22 PM
Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD
Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se and currently detained in the Rushville Treatment and Detention Center, pursue claims that they are being denied a nutritionally adequate religious diet and are being retaliated against for pursuing their right to a religious diet.
This case is set for a conference on July 30, 2012, but the conference will be cancelled as unnecessary. All Defendants except Defendant Dredge have been served, and there are no pending issues to discuss.
1) The status conference set for July 30, 2012, is cancelled. The clerk is directed to notify Plaintiffs' detention center of the cancellation.
2) The parties are reminded of their option to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (See attached form).
3) By August 3, 2012, counsel for Defendant Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, is directed to inform the Court whether he will be filing an appearance for Defendant Dredge, and, if not, where Defendant Dredge's waiver of service should be sent. The clerk sent Dredge's waiver of service to Aramark's corporate headquarters in Pennsylvania, but the waiver has not been returned.
4) The clerk is directed to update the docket to show that the correct name of Defendant Aramark Food Services Corp. is Aramark Correctional Services, LLC.
5) By September 14, 2012, the parties shall provide to each other the initial disclosures described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(i)-(ii).
6) Plaintiffs shall disclose expert witnesses and expert testimony pursuant to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) by October 1, 2012.
7) Defendants shall disclose expert witnesses and expert testimony pursuant to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. ...