The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge:
This Document Relates to:
Natasha Haley, et al. v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-12892-DRH-PMF1
On March 1, 2012, the Court granted Bayer defendants' motion to dismiss without prejudice the claims of certain plaintiffs for failure to comply with their Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS) requirements. On April 26, 2012, plaintiffs filed a motion to vacate the order of dismissal as to twenty-four plaintiffs. Bayer responded, stating that eleven of the twenty-four plaintiffs had not fully complied with their PFS obligations. With regard to the eleven purportedly non-compliant plaintiffs (Emily De La Cruz, Andrea Ferris, Sarah Fleck, Austin Frazier, Patricia Garcia, Rachel Locken, Nicole Love, Kylie Pulliam, Michelle Rhodes, Allison Tinder, and Sarah Vine), the Court denied the motion to vacate.
1 This order applies to the following Plaintiffs: Emily De La Cruz, Andrea Ferris, Sarah Fleck, Austin Frazier, Patricia Garcia, Rachel Locken, Nicole Love, Kylie Pulliam, Michelle Rhodes, Allison Tinder, and Sarah Vine.
These eleven plaintiffs have filed a renewed motion to vacate the order dismissing their actions. Bayer has responded stating that it is not opposed to the renewed motion to vacate.
Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the orders dismissing without prejudice the claims of the following plaintiffs and directs the Clerk of the Court to REINSTATE the same: