Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dion Macklin v. At&T Mobility Services

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION


May 30, 2012

DION MACKLIN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sue E. Myerscough, U.S. District Judge:

E-FILED

Wednesday, 30 May, 2012 03:03:06 PM

Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD

OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (d/e 4) entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on May 9, 2012, recommending that this Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (d/e 1) for want of prosecution. Neither party filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Thus, this Court accepts the Report and Recommendation. See Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Centers, Inc., 577 F.3d 752, 760 (7th Cir. 2009) ("If no party objects to the magistrate judge's action, the district judge may simply accept it.")

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (d/e 4) is ACCEPTED by this Court;

(2) Plaintiff's Complaint (d/e 4) is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FOR THE COURT:

SUE E. MYERSCOUGH UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE

20120530

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.