The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Robert W. Gettleman
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on plaintiff-relator Dimitri Yannacopoulos' ("plaintiff") objections to defendants' bills of costs. This court granted summary judgment to defendants on July 16, 2009. On July 26, 2011, the court of appeals affirmed that judgment. U.S. ex rel. Yannacopoulos v. General Dynamics, 652 F.3d 818 (7th Cir. 2011). Defendant General Dynamics filed a bill of costs seeking $36,989.49. Defendant Lockheed Martin also filed a bill of costs seeking $240,031.39. For the reasons stated herein, the bills are granted in part and denied in part.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), a prevailing party may recover costs other than attorney's fees unless otherwise disallowed by a statute, other rule or court order. Costs that are generally recoverable may include: fees of the clerk and marshal; fees for printed or electronically recorded transcripts necessarily obtained for use in the case; fees and disbursements for printing and witnesses; fees for exemplification and the costs of making copies of any materials where the copies are necessarily obtained for use in the case; docket fees; and compensation of court appointed experts and interpreters. 28 U.S.C. § 1920. In analyzing a bill of costs, there "is a presumption that the prevailing party will recover costs, and the losing party bears the burden of an affirmative showing that taxed costs are not appropriate." Beamon v. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Co., 411 F.3d 854, 864 (7th Cir. 2005). An award of costs requires two inquiries: "(1) whether the cost imposed on the losing party is recoverable and (2) if so, whether the amount assessed for that item was reasonable." Majeske v. City of Chicago, 218 F.3d 816, 824 (7th Cir. 2000).*fn1
Defendant General Dynamics seeks court reporter fees amounting to $15,162.86. This sum consists of $6,738.55 in transcript fees, $5,146.56 in exhibit copies, $655.49 for a court reporter's appearance, and $2,622.26 for video recording. The last item, video recording, further breaks down to $690.93 for CD-ROM costs and $1,931.63 for the videographer's attendance. Defendant Lockheed Martin seeks its own court reporter fees amounting to $17,620.17. This sum breaks down to $4,984.97 in transcript fees, $5,096.70 in exhibit copies, and $7,538.50 in video recording. The video recording costs are $6,833.50 in CD-ROM costs and $705 for the videographer's attendance.
28 U.S.C. § 1920(2) awards costs for "fees for printed or electronically recorded transcripts necessarily obtained for use in the case." In his Consolidated Objections to defendants' Bill of Costs plaintiff does not object to the transcript fees sought by either defendant. Therefore, defendant General Dynamics is awarded $6,738.55 and defendant Lockheed Martin $4,984.97 in transcript costs.
Plaintiff does object to defendants' claim for costs for exhibit copies, arguing that these costs are inappropriate because plaintiff always provided defense counsel with hard copies of the exhibits at the depositions. In Cengr v. Fusibond Piping Sys., Inc., 135 F.3d 445, 456 (7th Cir. 1998), the court refused to grant costs for copying exhibits because the defendant was given copies of the exhibits. Here, because defendants were provided copies of the exhibits during the deposition, the requests for costs for exhibit copies of $5,146.56 and $5,096.70 are denied.
Defendant General Dynamics also seeks $655.49 for the court reporter's attendance. The 7th Circuit, in Extra Equipamentos E Exportacao Ltda. v. Case Corp., 541 F.3d 719, 727 (7th Cir. 2008), noted that "since the reporter cannot make the transcript without attending the hearing, the separate attendance fee is properly regarded as a component of the fee for the transcript." Defendant General Dynamics' request for $655.49 is granted.
Finally, plaintiff objects to the video recording fees sought by defendants. Plaintiff argues that the costs to convert the depositions to a CD-ROM format should be excluded because defendants do not explain the cost or justify its use. Defendants argue that conversion to CDROM format was necessary to preserve the deposition for use at a potential trial. Plaintiff briefly challenges the $705 videographer fee sought by defendant Lockheed Martin, but does not challenge the corresponding $1,931.63 fee sought by defendant General Dynamics. As 28 U.S.C. § 1920(2) states, costs may be awarded for "electronically recorded transcripts." Here, defendants are awarded the costs for the attendance of the videographer, $1,931.63 for defendant General Dynamics and $705 for defendant Lockheed Martin, because these correspond to the defendants obtaining the deposition. Defendants are not awarded the costs for conversion to CD-ROM, because these were conveniences for defendants' attorneys that were not necessary to the case. Accordingly, defendant General Dynamics is awarded $1,931.63 and defendant Lockheed Martin $705.
In sum, defendant General Dynamics is awarded $9,325.67, and defendant Lockheed Martin is awarded $5,689.97 in court reporter costs.
II. Exemplification Costs
Defendant General Dynamics submits exemplification costs of $8,046.10, which includes $1,646.66 for document production, $6,007.70 for electronic copies, $173.74 for summary judgment briefing copy costs, and $218.00 in copy costs paid to the clerk of court. Defendant Lockheed Martin seeks exemplification costs of $214,905.06, which includes $43,974.70 for document production, $64,109.68 for electronic ...