Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Lamar Fuller

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


March 27, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LAMAR FULLER, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David R. Herndon Chief Judge United States District Court

ORDER OF FINDING OF NO THIRD-PARTY INTERESTS (FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE)

On January 18, 2008, this Court entered an order for forfeiture against defendant Montez Lamar Fuller for the following property which had been seized from the defendant:

One 1995 GMC Yukon, VIN: 1GKEK13KXSJ729675, and all attachments, and accessories thereto.

The order further provided that the government would provide an opportunity for persons to claim a legal interest in the property pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1).

The Court notes that notice was published by the government in the Edwardsville Intelligencer newspaper on May 8, 2008, May 14, 2008 and May 21, 2008, and that no third party filed a petition within 30 days after the last date of said publication to allege an interest in the property.

Consequently, the court hereby finds, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(7), that no third-party petitions were filed and that the United States of America has clear title to the above-described property that is the subject of the Order of Forfeiture filed on January 18, 2008, namely:

One 1995 GMC Yukon, VIN: 1GKEK13KXSJ729675, and all attachments, and accessories thereto.

The United States informs the Court that the property is currently not within the jurisdiction of the United States. Should the property later on be returned to the jurisdiction of the United States, the United States Marshal shall seize it and dispose of it pursuant to law. In the alternative, the United States may abandon the forfeiture if it concludes that there is not enough value to the vehicle to justify the costs of seizure and sale.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2012.03.27 20:54:12 -05'00'

20120327

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.