Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Candace Bush v. Starbucks Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION


January 23, 2012

CANDACE BUSH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Starbucks Corporation ("Starbucks") has filed its Answer and Defenses ("ADs") to the ADA action brought against it by Candace Bush. This sua sponte memorandum opinion and order addresses a repeatedly occurring problematic aspect of that responsive pleading.

Many of the Answer's responses (Answer ¶¶3, 6, 8, 9, 12, 15, 21 and 23) follow an invocation of the disclaimer of some of Bush's allegations--a disclaimer that tracks the language of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(5)--by stating that Starbucks "therefore, denies them." This Court has had to deal with distressing frequency with the oxymoronic nature of such a combination--indeed, as chance would have it, Starbucks' counsel has been tagged with one of this Court's opinions on the subject so recently in another case that counsel have noticed up a motion for presentment on January 25 in which they seek leave to file an Amended Answer to cure that flaw.

There is no need for counsel to spend their time (for which this Court would require that they not bill the client) for that purpose. Instead the quoted phrase is simply stricken from each of the cited paragraphs of the Answer. This action remains set for a February 28 status hearing.

20120123

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.