Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Daniel Virnich v. Jeffrey Vorwald

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit


January 3, 2012

DANIEL VIRNICH,
PLAINTIFF‐APPELLANT,
v.
JEFFREY VORWALD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS‐APPELLEES.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 3:09‐cv‐00340 Barbara B. Crabb, Judge.

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

ORDER

The court's opinion of December 20, 2011, is hereby amended as follows: On page 18, footnote 4 is amended by striking the indicated language:

This rule is consistent with federal law and the state law of Illinois and Indiana. See Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway & Park District, 557 F.2d 580, 595 (7th Cir. 1977) (federal and Illinois law), vacated on other grounds, 435 U.S. 992 (1978); Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 87 F.3d 872, 878 (7th Cir. 1996) (Indiana law); see also Erebia v. Chrysler Plastic Products Corp., 891 F.2d 1212, 1215 n. 1 (6th Cir. 1989) ("the established rule in the federal courts is that a final judgment retains all of its preclusive effect pending appeal"); Robi v. Five Platters, Inc., 838 F.2d 318, 327 (9th Cir. 1988) (same for issue preclusion)."

The corrected footnote 4 shall read:

This rule is consistent with federal law and the state law of Indiana. See Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway & Park District, 557 F.2d 580, 595 (7th Cir. 1977) (federal law), vacated on other grounds, 435 U.S. 992 (1978); Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 87 F.3d 872, 878 (7th Cir. 1996) (Indiana law); see also Erebia v. Chrysler Plastic Products Corp., 891 F.2d 1212, 1215 n. 1 (6th Cir. 1989) ("the established rule in the federal courts is that a final judgment retains all of its preclusive effect pending appeal"); Robi v. Five Platters, Inc., 838 F.2d 318, 327 (9th Cir. 1988) (same for issue preclusion)."

20120103

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.