Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re: Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


October 24, 2011

IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David R. Herndon Chief Judge United States District Court

Order Dismissing With Prejudice

This Document Relates to:

Ashley Bopp v. Bayer Corp., et al. Meagan Moore v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:10-cv-12660-DRH-PMF No. 3:10-cv-12696-DRH-PMF Jennie Coachman v. Bayer Corp., et Nicole Powell v. Bayer Corp., et al. al. No. 3:10-cv-11016-DRH-PMF No. 3:10-cv-11030-DRH-PMF Cora Gaudio v. Bayer Corp., et al. Janessa Turner v. Bayer HealthCare No. 3:10-cv-10815-DRH-PMF Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-12555-DRH-PMF Kathryn Harris v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10249-DRH-PMF Tereasa Turner v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:10-cv-11105-DRH-PMF Nina Kendrick v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:10-cv-13586-DRH-PMF

ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE

This matter is before the Court on defendant Bayer HealthCare

Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s ("Bayer") motion, pursuant to Case Management Order 12 ("CMO 12"), for an Order dismissing plaintiffs' claims in the above-captioned matters with prejudice for failure to comply with their Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") obligations.

On June 30, 2011, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. moved to dismiss the above-captioned matters without prejudice for failure to comply with PFS obligations.*fn1 The Court granted these motions on July 21, 2011.*fn2 More than 60 days since the entry of the order of dismissal without prejudice has passed, and Plaintiffs still have not complied with their PFS obligations. Accordingly, on September 23, 2011, pursuant to Section E of CMO 12, Bayer moved for an Order converting the dismissal without prejudice to a dismissal with prejudice.

None of the plaintiffs has responded to Bayer's motion.

Having considered the motion and the relevant provisions of CMO 12 the Court ORDERS as follows:

Plaintiffs in the above captioned actions have failed to comply with their obligations pursuant to CMO 12 and more than 60 days have passed since the entry of the order of dismissal without prejudice for failure to comply with CMO 12. Accordingly, pursuant to Section E of CMO 12, plaintiffs' complaints are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Further, the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment reflecting the same. Each party shall bear its own costs.

SO ORDERED

Digitally signed by David R. Herndon

Date: 2011.10.24 11:14:02 -05'00'


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.