Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Margaret Wright v. Mary Ellen Bullock

October 12, 2011

MARGARET WRIGHT, PLAINTIFF
v.
MARY ELLEN BULLOCK, ET AL, DEFENDANTS



The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Gorman United States Magistrate Judge

E-FILED Thursday, 13 October, 2011 03:24:22 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD

ORDER

In an Order entered on Sept. 29, 2011, this Court deferred ruling on Plaintiff's motion to compel (#113) DCFS to produce certain documents. At a hearing, the Court was able to narrow down the dispute, as follows. The documents being sought were the "contextual" documents that might explain or provide context to a one-page document (Exh. 135) that had been produced during discovery. Because the motion to compel had not adequately directed attention to this particular exhibit, DCFS was allowed to supplement its response to the motion after it investigated Exhibit 135.

The supplement has now been filed. DCFS states that Exhibit 135 was part of two other exhibits that had been previously produced during discovery. In an abundance of caution, DCFS states that it re-produced these two documents to the Plaintiff.

The motion to compel is accordingly DENIED.

John A. Gorman

20111012

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.