Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


August 30, 2011

IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge:

ORDER

VACATING DISMISSAL

This Document Relates to:

Michaela Utegg v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-20021-DRH-PMF Misty Naumann v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-20022-DRH-PMF Stacy Klee v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-20023-DRH-PMF Jolanta Fredericks, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-20024-DRH-PMF

ORDER

The plaintiffs in the above captioned actions have filed motions to vacate the Court's orders dismissing each case without prejudice for failure to comply with Plaintiff Fact Sheet Requirements (Utegg Doc. 19, Naumann Doc. 20, Klee Doc. 18, Fredericks Doc. 19). Each plaintiff states that she is now in compliance with her PFS obligations. Id. Bayer has is not opposed to plaintiffs' motions to vacate (Utegg Doc. 20, Naumann Doc. 21, Klee Doc. 19, Fredericks Doc. 20). Accordingly, the Court hereby vacates the orders dismissing without prejudice plaintiffs' actions and thereby reinstates each of the above captioned cases.

SO ORDERED:

Digitally signed by

David R. Herndon Chief Judge United States District Court

Date: 2011.08.30 14:26:34 -05'00'

20110830

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.