IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
August 15, 2011
F.B.N. SHIPPING SOLUTIONS, INC., PLAINTIFF,
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge
PNC Bank, National Association ("PNC") has just filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses ("ADs") to Count III of the Complaint brought against it by F.B.N. Shipping Solutions, Inc. ("FBN"). This memorandum order is issued sua sponte to address a problematic aspect of that responsive pleading.
Many (too many) of the paragraphs of PNC's Answer (Answer ¶¶5-8, 10, 12 and 15 (the latter in all but one subparagraph)) begin in this fashion:
PNC refers to the contents of the documents which are the best evidence of their contents and denies the allegations of paragraph -- to the extent they mischaracterize the cited documents.
That is totally unacceptable, for it leaves the reader to guess what PNC and its counsel believe to be "mischaracterizations." That subverts the federal concept of notice pleading that applies to defendants and plaintiffs alike. Accordingly all of those paragraphs of the Answer are stricken, but with leave granted to replead in proper fashion on or before August 26, 2011.*fn1
Finally, this Court expresses no view either way as to the appropriateness and viability of the ADs that follow PNC's Answer. If FBN perceives any deficiencies there, it would be its burden to raise them by motion (note that Rule 7(a) does not allow ADs to be answered).