Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Richard Neville v. Octa Pharma Plasma

August 4, 2011

RICHARD NEVILLE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
OCTA PHARMA PLASMA, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Mills, U.S. District Judge:

E-FILED

Thursday, 04 August, 2011 04:02:40 PM

Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD

ORDER

This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by the magistrate judge.

On May 19, 2011, the pro se Plaintiff filed his Complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The same day, by Text Order, United States Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore Denied the Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and Directed the Plaintiff to pay the filing fee on or before July 1, 2011, or risk dismissal of the case for want of prosecution.

In a Report and Recommendation entered on July 6, 2011, Judge Cudmore noted that Plaintiff had failed to pay the Court's filing fee. Therefore, Judge Cudmore recommended that the Complaint be dismissed for want of prosecution.

The Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation.

Ergo, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [d/e 3] entered by the magistrate judge. This action is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.

FOR THE COURT:

Richard Mills United States District Judge

20110804

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.