United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
June 29, 2011
JENIFER G. HALL, ET AL.
Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge SHARON JOHNSON COLEMAN Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge
DOCKET ENTRY TEXT:
The plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis [#20] is denied. The plaintiff has sufficient funds to pay the appellate fees; moreover, the court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. The plaintiff is therefore ordered to pay the appellate fees of $455 within fourteen days or the Court of Appeals may dismiss his appeal for want of prosecution. The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the PLRA Attorney, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
O [For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.
The plaintiff, a federal prisoner, has brought this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The plaintiff claims that the defendants, municipal and federal law officers, violated the plaintiff's constitutional rights by conducting an illegal, warrantless raid of his home in 2006.
By Minute Order of May 31, 2011, the court summarily dismissed the complaint on preliminary review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A as time-barred. The plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment and seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
The motion is denied. In his declaration, the plaintiff reveals that he has a current balance of $1,100.00 in his prison trust account. Because the plaintiff is a prisoner for whom the State provides the necessities of life, such assets do not qualify him for pauper status. See Lumbert v. Illinois Department of Corrections, 827 F.2d 257, 260 (7th Cir. 1987); Zaun v. Dobbin, 628 F.2d 990, 993 (7th Cir. 1980). A prisoner, like any other person contemplating a civil suit, must consider the cost of the litigation versus the probability of success. The court finds that the plaintiff is financially able to pay the $455.00 appellate fees.
In any event, the court is satisfied that this action does not raise a substantial issue meriting appellate review. Accordingly, the court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that the appeal is not in good faith (CONTINUED) STATEMENT (continued) and that no appeal should be taken. When a suit is found to be frivolous, an ensuing appeal generally cannot be "in good faith" under § 1915(a)(3). Moran v. Sondalle, 218 F.3d 647, 650 (7th Cir. 2000).
Under the rules of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Court, if the district court certifies that an appeal is not taken in good faith, the appellant cannot prosecute the appeal in forma pauperis but rather must pay the appellate fees in full for the appeal to go forward. Consequently, the plaintiff must pay the full $455 within fourteen days or the Court of Appeals may dismiss his appeal for want of prosecution. See Evans v. Illinois Dept. of Corrections, 150 F.3d 810, 812 (7th Cir. 1998). If the plaintiff wishes to contest this court's finding th at the appeal is not taken in good faith, he must file a motion with the Court of Appeals seeking review of this court's certification within thirty days of service of this order. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5).
In sum, the plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied. The plaintiff is ordered to remit to the Clerk of the Court the $455 appellate fee within fourteen days of the date of this order. If the plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court of Appeals may dismiss his appeal. The plaintiff is responsible for ensuring payment of the filing fees as directed by this order, and should ensure that the institution having custody of him transmits the necessary funds. Nonpayment for any reason other than destitution shall be construed as a voluntary relinquishment of the right to file future suits in forma pauperis. The obligation to ensure full payment of the filing fees imposed by this order shall not be relieved by release or transfer to another prison. The plaintiff is under a continuing obligation to inform the Clerk of this Court in writing of any change of address within seven days.
Payment shall be sent to the Clerk, United States District Court, 219 S. Dearborn St., Chicago, Illinois 60604, attn: Cashier's Desk, 20th Floor. Payment should clearly identify the plaintiff's name, as well as the district court and appellate court case numbers assigned to this action.
The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the PLRA Attorney, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.