IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
June 8, 2011
MONTEZ L. FULLER, PETITIONER,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge:
Now before this Court is petitioner's motion to supplement his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion with additional authority (Doc. 14). Local Rule 7.1(c) for the Southern District of Illinois states "If a party believes it is necessary to supplement its brief with new authority due to a change in the law or facts that occurred after the filing of its brief, the party must seek leave of court to file a supplemental brief." (emphasis added). Here, the supplemental authority petitioner provides is case law decided years prior to the filing of his § 2255 motion. As such, petitioner's motion to supplement is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Chief Judge United States District Court
Date: 2011.06.08 13:47:59 -05'00'
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.