UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
May 9, 2011
MAURICE A. JACKSON,
C/O PHILLIPS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge
Inmate No. R31861,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier's Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 29) of April 4, 2011, wherein it is recommended that the Court deny Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24). Neither Plaintiff Maurice Jackson nor Defendants filed an objection to the R & R.
After reviewing a report and recommendation, the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in the report. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
Here, again, neither party has filed an objection to Magistrate Judge Frazier's R & R. The Court has reviewed the R & R for clear error and finds that it is not clearly erroneous. As such, the Court ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 29) in its entirety, whereby the Court DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24).
IT IS SO ORDERED
J. Phil Gilbert
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.