IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
April 14, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
DARRYL D. ANDERSON,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge:
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
Now before the Court is Anderson's motion for docket sheet (Doc. 32). Specifically, Anderson moves the Court for the docket sheet and his plea agreement. Based on the following, the Court denies the motion.
In order to obtain transcripts/documents free of charge Anderson must demonstrate: (1) that he has exhausted all means of access to his files (i.e. through his trial and appellate counsel), (2) that he is financially unable to secure access to his court files (i.e., through a showing similar required in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) which includes a certified copy of the prisoner's account for the previous six-month period prior to filing), and (3) that the documents requested are necessary for the preparation of some specific non-frivolous court action. See United States v. Wilkinson, 618 F.2d 1215, 1218-19 (7th Cir. 1980); Rush v. United States, 559 F.2d 455, 459 (7th Cir. 1977). Bald allegations that he needs the documents will not do. Moreover, case law indicates that Anderson must first file the 2255 action in order to obtain the documents. See United States v. Horvath, 157 F.3d 131, 132-33 (2nd Cir. 1998)(collecting cases).
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Anderson's motion for docket sheet (Doc. 32).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
David R. Herndon Chief Judge United States District Court
2011.04.14 14:44:35 -05'00'
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.