Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Garden City Employees' Retirement System, and Indiana Laborers Pension Fund v. Anixter International

March 31, 2011


The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr.


Garden City Employees' Retirement System and Indiana Laborers Pension Fund ("Plaintiffs") bring this putative class action under §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78t(a), on behalf of themselves and all persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Anixter International Inc. ("Anixter" or the "Company") between January 29, 2008 and October 20, 2008, inclusive. On November 17, 2009, this Court appointed Indiana Laborers Pension Fund as Lead Plaintiff [36], and on January 6, 2010, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint [39]. Before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss that complaint [43]. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to strike certain materials Defendants attached to their motion to dismiss [47]. For the following reasons, Defendants' motion [43] is granted and Plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs' motion to strike [47] is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Allegations in Plaintiffs' Complaint*fn1

Plaintiffs allege that beginning on January 29, 2008 and continuing throughout the class period, Defendants engaged in a scheme to deceive and defraud investors of the true value of Anixter's stock in violation of federal securities law. The "core of plaintiff's claims" is that "the organic growth projection of 8-12% [Defendants] gave to the market was without a reasonable basis (and achieving it was becoming more remote as the economy soured), and that defendants' fervent and repeated denials that Anixter was being negatively affected by the slowing economy were false and misleading." (Pl. Resp. Mot. Dismiss [46] at 14-15). Plaintiffs contend that while Anixter's stock was artificially inflated, Individual Defendants sold off some of their own holdings for handsome gains.

Defendant Anixter is a publicly-traded Delaware corporation with its headquarters in Glenview, Illinois. ¶ 30. The Individual Defendants were officers of Anixter during some or all of the class period: Defendant Robert J. Eck is President and CEO of Anixter; prior to that he was the Company's chief operating officer and executive vice president. ¶ 31. Defendant Dennis

J. Letham is Anixter's executive vice president of finance and chief financial officer, and Defendant Robert Grubbs was president and CEO of Anixter from February 1998 to June 2008, Id.

Anixter is a global supplier of communication products, electrical and electronic wire and cable, fasteners and other small parts used to connect voice, video, data and security systems. ¶

2. Anixter operates through three main lines of business: (1) the Enterprise Cabling and Security Solutions ("ECS") group; (2) the Electric Wire and Cable ("EWC") group, and (3) the Operating End Markets ("OEM") group. ¶ 36. The ECS group represented approximately 54% of the Company's total revenue in 2007 and 52% in 2008. Id. The EWC group represented approximately 28% of revenue in 2007 and 29% in 2008. ¶ 37. The OEM group-the smallest division-represented approximately 18% of revenue in 2007 and 19% in 2008. ¶ 37. In 2007, 70% of the Company's sales were from North America, 22% were from Europe, and 8% were from other emerging markets (Latin America and Asia Pacific). ¶ 39. The majority of the OEM business (56%) is based in Europe. ¶ 37. Accordingly, simple math applied to Plaintiffs' allegations shows that about 10 percent of Anixter's sales come from its European OEM business.

A. Pre-Class Period Allegations

Historically, Anixter had grown its sales base through both strategic acquisitions and organic sales growth. ¶ 40. However, acquisition opportunities dried up during 2007 leaving the Company dependant on organic sales to drive its overall sales growth. ¶¶ 40, 41. But during the first parts of 2007, the Company's organic growth rate also had been in decline, falling from 22% to 19% in the first quarter of 2007 and to 17% in the second quarter. ¶ 43.

Plaintiffs allege that "as early as mid-2007, Defendants began telling investors that, despite declining economic conditions in the U.S. and abroad, Anixter expected to achieve organic revenue growth of 8% to 12% and gross margins of 24% in 2008." ¶ 42.

By late 2007, Plaintiffs allege that the U.S. and global economies were declining and credit markets were contracting. ¶ 42. In fact, in October 2007, the Company reported that there was a "significant amount of economic uncertainty * * * particularly in the U.S. related to the credit markets." Id. Plaintiffs allege that by the end of 2007 Anixter's sales and profits were under pressure due to slower global demand, including lower levels of non-residential construction and technology spending. ¶ 43. Moreover, Anixter's organic growth rate had continued to fall, to 9% in the third and fourth quarters of 2007. ¶ 43. In an attempt to allay investors' persistent concerns about the Company, in November 2007, the Company began aggressively repurchasing its stock. ¶ 44. This maneuver was met with some approval in the market. Id.

B. January and February 2008 Statements

On January 29, 2008 (the first day of the class period), Anixter issued a press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2007. ¶ 46. The Company reported year-over-year organic sales growth of 9%.*fn2 Id. In the press release, Defendant Grubbs reported that Anixter had continued to experience "strong growth * * * from our strategic initiatives in the security and OEM markets." ¶ 47. Grubbs also reported that the Company had a "solid backlog and healthy pipeline of potential new projects and customers" both in Europe and North America. Id. However, Grubbs also recognized that "sales in Europe were flat as compared to unusually strong sales in the year ago quarter." Id. Overall, Grubbs told investors that Anixter would continue to achieve "solid sales and earnings growth" in 2008 despite deteriorating market conditions. For example, Grubbs stated:

While 2008 begins with a well publicized, less certain overall economic environment than 2007, recent activity levels suggest the end markets we serve have remained strong and we are comfortable they will continue to present opportunities for growth in the coming year. ¶ 48.

The same day, the Company held an earnings conference call with analysts and investors to discuss the Company's earnings and operations. ¶ 49. Describing the Company's performance in 2007, Defendant Letham stated that "[o]verall end market demand remain [sic] healthy across all markets. Larger project demand generally remained robust and we continue to have good success with our strategic initiatives." Id. Defendant Letham stated that despite "economic uncertainty in other parts of the economy," the Company had "performed so strongly" during the last quarter of 2007. Letham stated that "early indications" suggested that the trend would continue into 2008. Id.; see also ¶ 51.

During the call, Defendant Letham recognized that as compared to 2006, the 2007 "year on year sales in Europe were flat" and that growth in Europe had slowed compared to prior years. ¶ 50. However, Letham said that the Company's "business activity levels in Europe remain strong" and that the Company was "optimistic" about "growth in Europe in the coming quarters." Id. In response to a question from an analyst about whether the Company could sustain "that level of growth in that let's say nine to 11% range continuing ahead here in Europe," Letham responded that "to answer your questions about Europe, we are still comfortable driving the kind of growth we have driven." ¶ 52.

After the call ended, the Company's stock price rose 18%, or $10.55 per share in a single day, to close at $68.85 per share. ¶ 53. That same day, Grubbs sold 14,000 Anixter shares for proceeds of $938,000. Id. On February 15, 2008, when the stock was between $66.91 and $68.29 per share, Defendant Letham sold 3,668 shares for proceeds of $248,199. Id.*fn3

On February 21, 2008, the Company filed its 2007 Form 10-K for the period ending December 28, 2007, which Defendants Letham and Grubbs signed. The Form 10-K reported that the Company had experienced "strong organic growth" in 2007 and, describing 2007 as compared to 2006, reported that the Company "continues to experience strong growth in security and OEM supply sales." ¶ 55; see also Ex. K to Def. Mem., at 17.

C. April 2008 Statements

On April 22, 2008 the Company issued a press release announcing its financial results for the first quarter of 2008. The Company reported year-over-year organic sales growth of 7%. ¶ 61. The Company also announced that its organic growth rate for Europe had fallen to only 2%. ¶ 69. However, other numbers for the quarter were positive, including a rise in sales, operating profits, and earnings per diluted share over the prior year quarter. ¶ 61.

In the press release, Defendant Grubbs discussed the Company's positive results and reported that he believed the Company would continue to succeed despite the worsening economic conditions:

The multiple end markets we serve, the diversity of industries in which our customers operate and the broad geographies over which our business is conducted have given is the ability to sustain overall growth despite certain economic concerns. We believe that the diversity and depth of our business will continue to work to our shareholders' benefit regardless of broader economic conditions.

¶ 61. Defendant Eck echoed Defendant's Grubbs' optimism about future prospects, yet Eck warned that the Company's growth could be affected by macro-economic conditions generally and in the European OEM market specifically. "Short-term macro-economic conditions may slow our organic sales growth from the rates of the past couple of years, which when combined with the investment in these initiatives may limit near-term earnings growth. We believe, however, that continued focus, investment and successful execution on these strategies will drive full-year and longer-term growth and profitability of the business." ¶ 62. Eck reported that the Company had seen a "number of customer-specific situations where spending was reduced in response to slower economic conditions, [but] we do not believe this represents a broader trend." Id. Regarding growth from the European OEM market, Defendant Eck identified "some pressure in the electrical wire & cable market on a global basis and in the OEM supply market in Europe." ¶ 63. Eck predicted that seasonal upticks in sales and "pricing actions" in the coming months would mitigate these issues. Id. Defendant Eck also blamed the first quarter's "divergent growth rates" in part on an unfavorable impact from the timing of New Year's and Easter, not on the global economic slowdown. Id.

Following the press release, the Company held an earnings conference call with analysts and investors wherein the Individual Defendants expanded on these themes. Defendant Letham explained that the "geographic diversity of our business model and various company driven initiates" allowed the Company to "mitigate the effects of the current economic slowdown." ¶ 64. While there was "concern about the condition of the U.S. economy," Eck explained that the Company's performance remained "healthy" and growing. ¶ 65. Letham stated that the first quarter's "healthy 7% organic sales growth," adjusted for the holidays was "in line with the lower end of our 8% to 12% organic growth target range." ¶ 64. Eck stated that the Company had noticed "softer corporate spending" but that much of the spending decrease was "relate[d] to specific project plans of individual customers." ¶ 65. "While some customers have reduced their production schedules, this was offset by growth with other customers and added products." Id. Similarly, Defendant Letham blamed a recent decline in daily booking activity in one of its product lines as "more of a seasonal pattern impact here" rather than "anything about the credit market issue" or "some broader economic issue." ¶ 67.*fn4

And while Letham again recognized the problems in the North American electrical wire & cable market and the European OEM market, Letham reported that "we've experienced recent improvements in both situations over the last several weeks." ¶ 64.

Following the Defendants' April 22, 2008 statements and the disclosure of slowed growth rates, Anixter's stock price dropped $10.31 between the closing price on April 21, 2008 and the closing price on April 24, 2008. ¶ 73.

D. July 2008 Statements

On July 22, 2008, the Company released its financial results for the second quarter of 2008. ¶ 74. Some numbers were indicative of solid performance, for example the Company reported a 10 percent increase in sales from the first to the second quarter of 2008. ¶ 75. However, the Company reported organic sales growth of only 4% for the quarter. ¶ 74. (Overall growth, including sales growth from recently completed acquisitions, was 7% for the quarter).

The Company also reported a slight decline in gross margins from the same quarter a year ago, from 24% to 23.8%. ¶ 75.

Discussing the slower organic sales growth rates, Defendant Eck said that the lower growth figure was not the result of any "broad-based negative trends." ¶ 74.

"While we continue to see select customer situations where sales are softer, we have not observed any broad-based negative trends in the various end markets and geographical regions where we have a business presence. We believe the overall market conditions, as they currently exist, should allow for consecutive quarter sales growth from the second to third quarter of this year. If we achieve a modest level of consecutive quarter growth, it will move our third quarter year-on-year growth rates closer to our longer-term target of 8 to 12 percent yearly growth."


Eck reported that he was "pleased with the 10 percent increase in sales from the first to the second quarter of this year, which despite continuing macroeconomic uncertainty, exceeded longer-term seasonal trends." ¶ 75. Eck explained that the lower sales growth rates were "modest due to the difficult comparison to last year's exceptionally strong second quarter." Id. While Defendant Eck reported that Anixter had experienced a slight decline in gross margins and "continued pressure from rising steel and specialty metal prices in our OEM Supply business," he told investors that operating margins had continued to improve due to increased sales and sound expense controls. Id. In fact, Eck reported that rising operating margins in Europe were sufficient to offset "gross margin pressures in the [European] OEM Supply business." Id.

In the subsequent conference call, Defendant Eck told listeners that "while there are continuing concerns about weaknesses in our economy, we are seeing good growth across our businesses and around the world." ¶ 77. According to Eck, "quote activity" was "holding reasonably steady" and the Company had not seen "big downward trends [in quote activity] anyplace." ¶ 78; see also id. ("Letham: * * * we have seen good quote activity in the OEM supply business * * *"). Defendant Eck closed his presentation with the words "[w]e expect the third quarter will again show sequential growth over the second quarter as well as over prior year." ¶ 77.

Defendants Eck and Letham explained that while the UK OEM supply business was being affected by "individual customers who may have slowing activity" these customers were being "offset by growth with other customers and other geographies." ¶¶ 78-79. Defendant Eck recognized that the OEM supply market in the UK was "beginning to slow a touch" because of "macroeconomic factors" but that despite this, growth out of Europe had been "decent" overall.

Id. Addressing the issue of continued "margin pressure from steel price increases," ¶ 77, Eck explained that "[w]hile we have succeeded in negotiating price increases with our customers * * * those increases tend to lag the continued run up in steel prices." Id.

During the question and answer session, one analyst asked about Anixter's ability to make forecasts about its sales and growth with precision. Defendant Letham responded:

Basically, we don't have a lot of hard visibility. Backlog here at any point in time is typically in the range of about a month. We have pipelines on project-type activity, pipeline tools that give us project activity outlook that extend beyond that but projects are 10%, 20% or so of our enterprise and electrical wire and cable business. The real issue here is you get your bulk of your business day-to-day, short order, so there is not a lot of long term visibility.

On July 31, 2008, the Company filed its Form 10-Q for the second quarter of 2008, in which the Company recognized that its major initiatives appeared to be succeeding despite "macroeconomic uncertainty that existed during the quarter." ¶ 83.

On the morning of July 22, Anixter's stock opened at $61.50 per share. On the morning of August 1, the stock opened at $68.29 per share, an increase of 11%.

E. Post-Class Period Allegations

The class period ends on October 20, 2008. On October 21, Anixter issued a press release announcing its financial results for the third quarter of 2008, which ended September 26, 2008. ¶ 96. The Company reported organic growth of only 2%. Id. Gross margins had declined further, to 23.4% (versus 24.1% in the year ago quarter). ¶¶ 91, 100.

In the accompanying press release, the Company stated: "[w]hile we experienced strength early in the third quarter, broader negative economic factors, especially in Europe, impacted sales activities late in the period." Id. While the quarter began favorably (July was the best month in the history of the Company), the Company admitted that its third quarter results had been affected by "macro economic trends." Id. The Company explained that it had been affected by lower operating margins in Europe and a decline in sales in their OEM supply business. ¶ 97.

Following the press release, the Defendants held a conference call where they further discussed how the Company's third quarter results had been affected by the slowing global economy. ¶¶ 99-102. During the call, the following exchange took place:

Analyst: Hi, good morning. Just following up on that idea, if you look at the Enterprise Ts here, where would you the project activity level is in this fourth quarter and in the last month of the third quarter? As a percentage I guess you talked about a 15 to 20% range but that's slightly more than average, what do you think it is right now?

Letham: It's probably in the mid to low teens right now.

Analyst: And.

Letham: It definitely pulled in the last couple of quarters, we were probably pursing that 20% number late last year, early part of this year and I think we've definitely probably given up at ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.