Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re: Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


March 22, 2011

IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge

ORDER

This Document Relates to:

Rebecca Cashion v. Bayer Corp. et al. No. 3:10-cv-10234-DRH-PMF Nadine Checchia v. Bayer Corp. et al. No. 3:10-cv-10081-DRH-PMF Nicole Lewis v. Bayer Corp. et al. No. 3:10-cv-10906-DRH-PMF Staci Monk v. Bayer Corp. et al. No. 3:10-cv-20285-DRH-PMF

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s motions, pursuant to Case Management Order 12 ("CMO 12"), for an Order dismissing Plaintiffs' claims, in the above-captioned matters, with prejudice for failure to comply with their Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") obligations.

On December 22, 2010, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. moved to dismiss the above-captioned matters without prejudice for failure to comply with PFS obligations (Cashion DOC. 13; Checchia DOC. 16; Lewis DOC. 5; Monk DOC. 8). The Court granted the motion on January 14, 2011 (Cashion DOC. 14; Checchia DOC. 17; Lewis DOC. 6; Monk DOC. 9). More than 60 days since the entry of the order of dismissal without prejudice have passed, and Plaintiffs still have not complied with their PFS obligations.

Accordingly, pursuant to Section E of CMO 12, Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. respectfully requests that the Court issue an Order converting the dismissal without prejudice to a dismissal with prejudice. Having considered the motion and the relevant provisions of CMO 12 the Court ORDERS as follows:

Plaintiffs in the above captioned actions have failed to comply with their obligations pursuant to CMO 12 and more than 60 days have passed since the entry of the order of dismissal without prejudice for failure to comply with CMO 12. Accordingly, pursuant to Section E of CMO 12, Plaintiffs complaints are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED

Digitally signed by

David R. Herndon Chief Judge United States District Court

2011.03.22 12:50:45 -05'00'

20110322

© 1992-2014 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.