Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


March 22, 2011

IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND RELEVANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge David R. Herndon

This Document Relates to:

Maricella Reyes, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al.

Case No. 3:10-cv-20433

Janneth Berryman, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20434

Meredith Fox, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20435

Adela Sanchez, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20436

Darlene Victor, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20443

Nicole Behlow, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20444

Irma Gonzalez, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20445

Jackie C. Knott, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20494

Corrine M. Ratcliff, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20495

Rolanda Coleman, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:09-cv-20496

Katherine L. Murphy, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20506

Kimble L. Colbert, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:11-cv-20018

Jessy Quintana-Yong, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:11-cv-20019

ORDER

On March 21, 2011, the parties in the above captioned actions filed identical stipulations (see e.g. Reyes 3:10-cv-20433 Doc. 20). The stipulations state that, in light of this Court's orders remanding Ryan Bleecher, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-20382-DRH-PMF (Doc. 32) and Josefina Brambila, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-20248-DRH-PMF (Doc. 27), the parties stipulate and agree that the above-captioned matters be remanded to state court, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the removal and other proceedings in federal court. See e.g., Id.

Upon consideration of the parties' stipulations, the Court ORDERS as follows:

Plaintiffs' motions to remand to state court are GRANTED.

Accordingly, the Clerk is instructed to REMAND the above captioned cases to the originating state court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Lastly, the Court will not award attorneys' fees and costs associated with Plaintiffs' motions to remand.

SO ORDERED:

Digitally signed by

David R. Herndon Chief Judge United States District Court

20110322

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.