Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Julie Brandenburg v. Earl L. Henderson Trucking Co.

February 15, 2011

JULIE BRANDENBURG, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EARL L. HENDERSON TRUCKING CO., LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court for case management. On February 4, 2011 Brandenburg filed replies to responses in opposition to her motions for summary judgment (Docs. 126 & 127). Also on February 14, 2011, Earl L.

Henderson Trucking Co. filed a reply to Brandenburg's memorandum in opposition to its motion for summary judgment (Doc. 128). Local Rule 7.1 (c) states in part:

Reply briefs are not favored and should be filed only in exceptional circumstances. The party filing the reply brief shall state the exceptional circumstances.

Here, none of the reply brief state the exceptional circumstances as to why a reply brief is needed. Thus, the Court STRIKES the replies.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed this 15th day of February, 2011.

David R. Herndon 2011.02.15 13:19:18 -06'00' Chief Judge United States District Court

20110215

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.