UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
February 7, 2011
DONALD DEMILLE BAKER, PRISONER #00769-081, PLAINTIFF,
DR. ZOKE, CLINICAL DIRECTOR, BOP, MARION, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud's Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 19) of November 10, 2010, wherein it is recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff Donald Demille Baker's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 13), grant Defendant Dr. Zoke's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17), and direct entry of judgment.
After reviewing a report and recommendation, the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in the report. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
Here, neither party has filed an objection to Magistrate Judge Proud's R & R. Subsequently, the Court has reviewed the R & R for clear error and finds that it is not clearly erroneous. As such, the Court ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 19) in its entirety, whereby the Court DENIES Baker's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 13), GRANTS Dr. Zoke's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17), and DISMISSES Dr. Zoke without prejudice. Further, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.