Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Opticsplanet, Inc v. Opticsale

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION


January 24, 2011

OPTICSPLANET, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
OPTICSALE, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Alexander Ostrovsky ("Ostrovsky"), whose retained counsel recently withdrew from representing him, now asks this Court to appoint counsel to represent him pro bono publico. To that end he has submitted an In Forma Pauperis Application ("Application") and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel ("Motion"), using forms provided by this District Court's Clerk's Office.

Ostrovsky appears to believe that he is entitled to be provided with free legal representation because, he says, he cannot afford to pay a lawyer. Although that is a constitutional entitlement in criminal cases, it is simply not true in civil litigation such as this action. This District Court's pro bono program, under which members of the trial bar may be made available to represent impecunious litigants, is discretionary on the part of the judge assigned to a case, and here Ostrovsky has provided nothing to justify such an appointment (see this District Court's LR 83.36(c)).

Accordingly both the Application and the Motion are denied. Ostrovsky must proceed in this action on his own unless he obtains replacement counsel.

20110124

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.